^Choosing and Modifying Cultural Identity^
Moon in Sagittarius
/moon goes void-of-course at 8:47p PT | 11:47p ET | 4:47a(Tu) UT
Luna square Neptune fits with "a man standing at a junction of cross roads, not knowing which way to go," for there are too many choices perhaps, or deciding information through research is needed, and "whichever way I go, no one will understand me" (the sun square Uranus). Yet we are impatient to get to "a spacious park with a baronial mansion in the background," that is, a secure position without the crowding of harrowing choices, "a goodly heritage." In fact a particular building in your memory may have an answer for you.
What group identities seem to be holding you back, yet at the same time supporting you? It's a paradox. You hold up "a flag," a particular organization, religious or political grouping, or cultural identity, and believe in it, yet you know it is not perfect and so it "turns into an eagle that crows," that is, you emerge from it to be your own self neither rejecting it totally nor kowtowing to its every nuance but making adjustments in your allegiance so you can be yourself fearlessly. What helps in this is wide intellectual learning or study, "a variety of books and papers in disorder," Too Much Info! which nevertheless is important in the right proportions. You select from it what you can handle well. It guides your allegiances.
Charubel puts in a good word for planet-gazers, "an astrological chart in square form," and says it indicates "a just, kind person." So astrologers are, to my perception over the decades, some wonderful people whose courage I admire. They follow out their "pilgrimage" regardless of support or censure because they have seen the truth of the stellar science, astral logic. In your own case, following any adventurous fortune is precarious, but carrying it out develops singular character.
{Monday} ^Choosing and Modifying Cultural Identity^
Cosmic Piper
P. S. In yesterday's (Sunday's) report was the following: ""A shepherd on the mountain top with crook in hand looking to find his sheep" could be candidates in Iowa looking for voters. Of course it is also Donald Trump and his rallies. Sol is in this degree today and Charubel says it indicates "one who, by reason of his superior powers and advantageous position in life, will be called to be a leader and a commander of a society, a community, or perchance a nation, in the capacity of president." "This ruler will be a ruler indeed." Who is that? The question of the day for Americans."
I wrote that before I knew that the New York Times is going to announce its endorsement for President Sunday evening (it's afternoon as I write). Charubel seems to have known that back in the 19th century! Why they are waiting until 10 p.m. Eastern on a Sunday night, I do not know. Whom will they choose? For my part I don't see how it could be anyone other than Elizabeth Warren. I could be wrong, but probably not as wrong as that same New York Times was in 2016 when, on the very afternoon of the election it was predicting Hillary Clinton as a handy winner!
No comments:
Post a Comment