^Choosing the Best^
P. S. A brilliant mathematician-physicist, Hugh Everett, who developed something called the "Many Worlds Theory," and much more, wrote:
“Once we have granted that any physical theory is essentially only a model for the world of experience,” Everett concluded in the unedited version of his dissertation, “we must renounce all hope of finding anything like the correct theory ... simply because the totality of experience is never accessible to us.”
This hits at something familiar to me as an astrologer. Yet this Hugh carries on, as did that Hugh, expanding his world of experience even though it is far from "totality." This Hugh believes we do not need such totality in order to draw wise conclusions from astrological observations. Totally.
Moon in Aries-->Taurus
/moon goes void-of-course at 12:43p PT | 3:43p ET | 7:43p UT
until it enters Taurus at 2:54p PT | 5:54p ET | 9:54p UT
There is something intense about money. This could be great loss or great gain, for differing individuals, but a focus on "Where is my money coming from?"
Something about secret ways of handling health issues as related to diet is significant in a favorable light.
Someone you like to play with, or have light times with, is going through intense changes. Possessiveness is being eliminated from love. This is hardly easy.
Someone artistic or musical, perhaps a woman, is greatly favored, enjoying attention and luxury, yet somehow stands apart or alone. Interesting potentials emerge as you merely grope toward whatever catches your fancy.
There can be doubt and change. You may wonder how sincere someone is who does well at play-acting. You should guard against being thrown off your track by attempting too much in vague directions. Someone liberal in a true sense, just and fair, could help you overcome feelings of being subjected to someone else who might have taken advantage of you. You can give up what you don't need in relationships while holding on to true values.
{Monday} ^Choosing the Best^
Cosmic Piper
“Once we have granted that any physical theory is essentially only a model for the world of experience,” Everett concluded in the unedited version of his dissertation, “we must renounce all hope of finding anything like the correct theory ... simply because the totality of experience is never accessible to us.”
This hits at something familiar to me as an astrologer. Yet this Hugh carries on, as did that Hugh, expanding his world of experience even though it is far from "totality." This Hugh believes we do not need such totality in order to draw wise conclusions from astrological observations. Totally.
No comments:
Post a Comment